Chamber of Digital Commerce founder and CEO Perianne Boring explains how Biden and regulators he appointed set the US behind competing nations on emerging tech like crypto, and compares this with Donald Trump’s plan to further integrate crypto into the U.S. economy.

Video Courtesy of Fox Business

At first glance, the Pi Network seemed promising — a new token backed by Stanford-educated developers, claiming technical superiority and offering free mining through a mobile app. The excitement was palpable, and since its 2019 launch, tens of millions have downloaded the app, accumulating free Pi tokens by simply pressing a button daily.

Now, almost six years after launch, users continue to earn Pi tokens the same way. But there's a glaring problem—those coins aren’t tradeable, and no exchange supports them. Despite the hype, the only recent development is that Pi now has an actual token on a blockchain, though it remains non-tradeable. Oddly, to finally launch their token they're simply implementing tech that has existed from on day 1.

So, what took 5 years? Or, does Pi Network's true business model revolve around a user base believing the 'official launch' is right around the corner - while deliberately avoiding the launch as long as possible.

Years Waiting for What?

As Pi Network prepares for its much-anticipated mainnet launch, supposedly scheduled for December, more details have surfaced. It turns out that Pi will be using the Stellar Consensus Protocol (SCP), a well-established blockchain technology created by the Stellar network.

While most users don’t understand the implications, it’s a significant revelation. Rather than developing their own proprietary technology, Pi is simply leveraging open-source code from the Stellar blockchain, which launched in 2014, five years before Pi.

This isn’t inherently wrong - Stellar is a legitimate blockchain and there's a lot of upsides to using their technology - but the issue lies in Pi’s portrayal of their work. They’ve led users to believe they were busy developing something new and revolutionary.

Basically - Pi users have waited 5 years for them to launch using someone else's 10 year old technology.

No, You Didn't Mine Anything...

Pi Network calls it mobile mining, and the "mine coins from your smartphone!" has been a major reason for people to sign up in the first place. 

But the fine print will tell you this has always been and always will be a 'simulation' - in other words, you're playing a video game. There is a way to really mine Pi tokens now, but it requires running their node software - and of course, you'll need a real computer if you want to run it.

If millions of phones were actively validating transactions (mining), this wouldn't be necessary.

Not Adding Up...

Pi Network claims a user base of over 60 million worldwide, but this doesn’t align with the reality of only 6 million active wallets. Even more striking is that only 0.16% of these wallets show any activity—a level of engagement that's unusually low for a supposedly active blockchain.

If the "60 million" figure is accurate, it likely refers to total signups over time rather than active users. This number may include accounts created years ago, opened once, and subsequently abandoned, leading to inflated statistics that don’t reflect the current state of user engagement.

Pi’s Future Value...

Pi fans searching for the token on CoinMarketCap often share their excitement to find a coin labeled “Pi” priced at $34.45. However, this is misleading. The listed coin appears to be a scam, a completely unrelated token using the Pi name and logo. The official Pi team has made it clear, their tokens cannot currently be transferred, and they have no listing on any exchange - so ignore this.

With no trading happening, all users can do is speculate, and the Pi Subreddit is full of this. Pi supporters engage in wildly optimistic price predictions. Most estimates fall somewhere in the range of $10 to $100, which is already insane.  Then there's the extremes, speculating as high as $1,000 per token guided by flawed reasoning like "if Pi becomes half as popular as Bitcoin...." These are guesses out of thin air, based on nothing. 

Pi should be looked at like any other coin that gave away large portion of it's supply to anyone willing to press a button, aka 'Tap To Earn'. If you look at what happens when these coins start to be traded, we see a huge number of holders simply unloading their supply as soon as possible, and the value immediately crashing.   Here's what happened with two recent launches of tap-to-earn tokens:

PIXELVERSE Token Chart

HMSTR Token Chart

Then, there's still so many free coins still in circulation, any time the coin begins to gain value, there's a long line of people still waiting to dump theirs, keeping the price down forever.

But really, just use your head. Ask yourself, if millions of people just got something for free, now they're saying you should want this thing too, except you will have to pay them real money for it - would you? There's nothing to motivate people who didn't get free coins, to spend their money to buy them from you.

So, What Are the Pi Owners Up to? 

While they haven't sold any Pi tokens, they may have found creative ways to monetize people wanting free ones.

With millions of people reportedly opening the Pi app each week to “mine” tokens by pressing a button, they’re also being served ads. This monetization model could be quite lucrative for Pi Network, especially if users are unaware they can disable the ads. On mobile apps, ad revenue can quickly add up when multiplied by millions of daily users.

But advertising may only scratch the surface of the Pi Network’s potential revenue streams. There’s a bigger concern: user data, which brings me to my next point...

Privacy Concerns...

When users sign up for Pi, they are agreeing to share a broad range of personal data. Pi Network collects browsing history, chat messages, comments, likes, location data (including GPS and Wi-Fi information), contact lists, device details, and more. This data can be shared with third parties, affiliates, professional advisors, service providers, and even governments.

With the introduction of Pi’s Know Your Customer (KYC) process, users are now required to submit government-issued IDs and selfies to verify their identity. This level of data collection makes Pi’s user database a goldmine for data brokers and facial recognition services.

Plus, KYC isn’t a legal requirement for projects that aren’t selling tokens via pre-sales, making Pi's decision to implement it a bit more questionable.

From a legal standpoint, it is no different from points earned in a video game — no one has traded them or purchased them, they have no known value - it's a strange situation to be requiring full ID verification for. 

The Bright Side?

To be fair - I can confidently give Pi Network the title of 'The Least-Evil Scam in Crypto". In fact, I don't think they've even broken any laws.

Unlike others, Pi Network has not asked users to invest any real money. While they may be exploiting anticipation for free crypto, collecting valuable data, and serving ads - they haven’t deceived people into losing funds.

Ultimately, while users may waste time pressing buttons, at least they haven’t been tricked into handing over their hard-earned money (but I guess they do waste the time spent earning it). 

While there are some privacy concerns, this unfortunately is so common, in most cases Pi is probably just one of several apps on users phones with privacy policies asking for way too much.

In my research for this story there was fairly large amount of people who have been pressing that button daily for years, accumulating thousands of free Pi tokens, and excited for the official launch where they believe they can sell them for $50 each.  So, the disappointment some will be feeling once the coins become tradeable seems to be the only real consequence.  

What's Next?

Pi claims this will happen in December, but if I'm correct on how they're currently profiting, the day the coins become tradeable, and worthless, is the day people stop opening up the app to 'mine' them. This means no more ad money for the Pi guys.

PayPal is taking another step forward in the cryptocurrency space, announcing on Wednesday that U.S. merchants can now buy, hold, and sell crypto directly through their business accounts.

This move reflects the growing mainstream acceptance of digital currencies, especially following the approval of Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) earlier this year. What was once considered a fringe asset class is now becoming more integrated into traditional finance.

"Business owners have increasingly expressed interest in having the same cryptocurrency options that consumers already enjoy," said Jose Fernandez da Ponte, PayPal’s Senior Vice President of Blockchain, Cryptocurrency, and Digital Currencies.

PayPal's Decision to Enter Crypto has Paid Off, Big...

PayPal first entered the crypto scene in 2020, allowing customers to trade and hold Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies within its platform. Since then, they’ve been leading the charge for fintech companies embracing digital currencies. Most notably, in August 2023, PayPal launched its own dollar-backed stablecoin, marking a major milestone as the first major fintech to introduce a stablecoin for payments and transfers.

Stablecoins, unlike more volatile cryptocurrencies, are tied to stable assets, providing a level of price protection for users wary of the dramatic swings often seen in the market.

In addition to this, PayPal is also allowing U.S. merchants to transfer cryptocurrencies externally to third-party wallets, further expanding their crypto functionality. However, there’s one notable exception—these new crypto services won’t be available to businesses in New York at launch.

PayPal's move into the crypto sector has been paying off, and is credited as a primary reason for the the company's stock boost this year, where it's climbed nearly 26% so far.

-------
Author: Mark Pippen
London Newsroom
GlobalCryptoPress | Breaking Crypto News

The conversion is underway, and just 1 week in to the process, Polygon is reporting the majority of tokens already converted (Over 60%).

Polygon is migrating from MATIC tokens to a new coin called POL, which will serve as the primary token for gas fees and staking while introducing features like multi-chain staking. This upgrade is expected to bolster network security by enabling staking across multiple chains within the Polygon ecosystem. The rebranding to POL also aligns better with the Polygon name, addressing a longstanding discrepancy where the token for 'Polygon' was traded under the symbol 'MATIC.' While the exact origins of this naming are unclear to many, including traders, the change seems logical.

The migration from MATIC to POL began on September 4, 2024, as a key initiative in the Polygon 2.0 roadmap. Originally announced in mid-2023, this upgrade aims to enhance the network’s scalability, security, and overall functionality.

Will the new token's features increase investor appeal?

The general consensus is positive. POL’s enhanced features, like multi-chain staking, are expected to appeal to investors by allowing staking across various chains in the Polygon network, thereby increasing network security and providing new fee-earning opportunities.

Do you need to take any action?

If you hold MATIC on the Polygon blockchain, your tokens will be automatically converted to POL. However, if you hold MATIC tokens (ERC-20) on Ethereum’s blockchain, you will need to visit the POL Portal to convert your tokens. For those holding MATIC on a centralized exchange, it’s essential to check with the exchange regarding their plans for the migration, as you may still need to manage the conversion manually in some cases.

-----------
Author: Trevor Kingsley
Tech News CITY // New York Newsroom

Update - Yesterday (Sept 8th): The Harris campaign released an outline of what her administration's key issues would be, which included some of the nation's hot topics, and touched on many smaller niche issues as well. 

But even with such a wide range of topics, somehow, not one of them was Cryptocurrency, which managed to go completely unmentioned. 

The original article is below:

The Biden administration has often been criticized as 'anti-crypto' due to a consistent lack of understanding of the industry's fundamentals. However, one of Kamala Harris’s advisors suggests that the current Vice President and Presidential nominee might take a different approach, supporting more pro-crypto policies.

While this news is intriguing, it's wise to remain cautious. The source of this information is Brian Nelson, a key policy adviser for Harris, who recently indicated that she would back measures favorable to the crypto industry.

However, it's important to remember that this is coming from an advisor...

Not a spokesperson, or Kamala herself.  Harris has yet to publicly address her views on digital assets, and the Democratic Party's platform does not mention crypto.  An advisor’s role is to suggest policies, and until Harris publicly endorses these views, nothing is official. This also means that if the stance doesn't materialize, it wouldn't be seen as a broken campaign promise.

For the crypto community to take this seriously, Kamala Harris needs to make a clear statement on her stance regarding digital assets.

According to Bloomberg, Brian Nelson shared during a roundtable at the Democratic National Convention that Harris plans to support policies that would enable the growth of emerging technologies like crypto. This marks the first public insight into how Harris might approach digital assets as a Presidential candidate. Previously, Harris's campaign had engaged with crypto leaders who expressed concerns about the Biden-Harris administration’s perceived hostility toward the industry.

In contrast, former President Donald Trump has fully embraced crypto. In July, he delivered a prominent speech at Bitcoin Nashville, promising to make the U.S. the “crypto capital of the planet.” 

---------------
Author: Oliver Redding
Seattle Newsdesk  / Breaking Crypto News

PayPal’s foray into the world of crypto has been a huge success for the company, and the highlight of this venture has to be their flagship stablecoin, PayPal USD (PYUSD), recently crossing the $1 billion mark in total market capitalization, as reported by CoinMarketCap.

Launched in 2023, PYUSD is pegged to the US dollar at a 1:1 ratio, ensuring stability and ease of use for transactions in the digital economy. The stablecoin is issued by Paxos Trust Company, a US-regulated entity known for its compliance and security standards in the crypto space.

As an ERC-20 token on the Ethereum blockchain, PYUSD benefits from Ethereum’s robust infrastructure and widespread adoption in the blockchain community. This design choice means it’s not only compatible with Ethereum but also integrates seamlessly with the broader ecosystem of third-party developers, wallets, and Web3 applications. For developers and businesses, this translates to an easier onboarding process for integrating PYUSD into their platforms and products, enabling a smoother user experience and expanding the utility of digital assets in everyday transactions.

The rise of PYUSD is a significant milestone, underscoring the growing demand for stable, fiat-backed digital currencies...

Stablecoins blend the benefits of blockchain technology with the familiarity of traditional money. According to Dan Schulman, president and CEO of PayPal, the increasing shift towards digital currencies necessitates reliable, easy-to-integrate financial instruments that are both digitally native and anchored by fiat currencies like the US dollar. PYUSD aims to fill this gap, offering a stable value that helps mitigate the volatility typically associated with cryptocurrencies.

Moreover, PYUSD is the only stablecoin currently supported by PayPal’s payments infrastructure, making it a unique offering in the digital payments space. This exclusivity suggests that PayPal is positioning PYUSD as a cornerstone of its strategy to bridge traditional finance and the decentralized finance (DeFi) world, catering to a growing user base that’s increasingly comfortable with digital currencies.

For crypto exchanges, the appeal of PYUSD lies in its backing by a trusted name like PayPal and a regulated issuer like Paxos, offering an extra layer of credibility that many other stablecoins lack. As stablecoins continue to play a pivotal role in the adoption of digital currencies, PYUSD’s rapid ascent highlights the potential for major fintech companies to influence and shape the future of digital payments.

With PYUSD’s market cap on the rise, all eyes are on how PayPal will leverage its established global reach and technological prowess to further drive the adoption of digital currencies and redefine the landscape of online payments. As the digital finance space evolves, PYUSD could be a key player in the ongoing transformation of how value is stored, transferred, and used in a world that’s increasingly turning to blockchain technology.

---------------
Author: Oliver Redding
Seattle Newsdesk  / Breaking Crypto News

Bitcoin Miners are being offered big money to switch their computing power over to AI. Matthew Sigel, VanEck's Head of Digital Assets Research says this trend will continue to grow...

Video Courtesy of CNBC

In a sweeping operation across Germany, authorities have confiscated nearly €25 million ($28 million) in cash from cryptocurrency ATMs that were operating without proper permits, according to a statement issued by the country’s financial regulator, BaFin, on Tuesday.

The operation targeted cryptocurrency ATMs located in 35 different sites across the country. These machines were facilitating the trade of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies but lacked the necessary licensing, which raised concerns about their potential use in money laundering activities.

BaFin collaborated closely with law enforcement agencies and the German Bundesbank to carry out this extensive operation. The seizure of these ATMs marks a significant step in Germany’s ongoing efforts to regulate the fast-growing cryptocurrency market, particularly in the wake of a global surge in Bitcoin ATM installations in 2024.

The crackdown also underscores Germany's commitment to stringent regulatory enforcement within the crypto space. ATM operators found to be in violation of licensing requirements face severe legal consequences, including penalties of up to five years in prison, according to AML Intelligence.

This recent action is part of a broader regulatory push by German authorities to manage the risks associated with cryptocurrencies. The German government has been under scrutiny for its approach to handling seized digital assets, particularly after it liquidated the last of its seized Bitcoins in July 2024. That sale included 3,846 Bitcoins, each valued at approximately $62,604, most of which had been confiscated in previous operations.

As Germany continues to tighten its grip on the cryptocurrency sector, this operation serves as a stark reminder to operators that compliance with regulatory requirements is not optional.

-------
Author: Mark Pippen
London Newsroom
GlobalCryptoPress | Breaking Crypto News

Late yesterday the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) officially approved Ethereum spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to begin trading today! Following in Bitcoin's footsteps, the world's second-largest cryptocurrency will now be accessible to investors through traditional markets.

Here's the list of the newly approved Ethereum ETFs and where you can find them:

• Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) - New York Stock Exchange
• Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) - CBOE Exchange
• VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) - CBOE Exchange
• Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) - New York Stock Exchange
• 21Shares Core Ethereum ETF (CETH) - CBOE Exchange
• Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) - CBOE Exchange
• iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) - Nasdaq
• Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) - CBOE Exchange

In addition to these, the SEC has also given the green light for Grayscale to convert its Grayscale Ethereum Trust (ETHE) to a spot ETF, which is a big deal for those tracking crypto investments.

For those of you who are new to ETFs, or exchange-traded fund, is an investment fund that owns the underlying asset it represents—in this case, Ethereum. When you buy shares of an Ethereum ETF, you are essentially buying a portion of the Ethereum owned by the ETF, which is managed by a financial company. This way, you can invest in Ethereum without needing to buy, store, or manage the cryptocurrency yourself.

Major BULL RUN Coming?!

What caught my eye is when looking back to May when the SEC approved Ethereum ETFs (said they will allow them, but did not yet have a launch date) Ethereum made some gains but, but there were multiple positive news stories that month, mainly US traders receiving conformation ETH 2.0 will not be viewed as a Security, and Ethereum's gains in May were mostly credited to news that US exchanges wouldn't have to de-list it.

When Bitcoin ETF's received the same approval investors responded in such large numbers it was actually credited with brining back the bull market. So by the time Bitcoin ETF's launched, most investors reacting to the news did so days/weeks earlier. This also likely had investors assuming 

I don't make price predictions, but I will make a suggestion that you take a look - when the market doesn't react to the announcement, it often means it will react to the launch. 

Those offering the ETH ETF are mostly the same companies that already offer the Bitcoin ETF, and they've done quite well, bringing in hundreds of millions of dollars.  They will now promote the ETH ETF to those same investors - and selling a token via an ETF requires the company to actually buy and own the asset. 

So, just something to consider.  

-------------------
Author: Oliver Redding
Seattle Newsdesk  / Breaking Crypto News

Crypto liquidations are expected to decrease this month, and the market is predicted to bounce back from August onwards, according to a report from JPMorgan (JPMJPM) released yesterday.

The bank has lowered its estimate of how much money has flowed into the crypto market this year from $12 billion to $8 billion. JPMorgan doubts that the earlier estimate of $12 billion would continue for the rest of the year because the price of Bitcoin (BTC) is quite high compared to its production cost or the price of gold.

“The reduction in the estimated net flow is largely driven by the decline in bitcoin reserves across exchanges over the past month,” said analysts led by Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou.

Combination of 3 Large Sell-offs are Holding Prices Down...

The sell off's by creditors of Gemini, the now-closed crypto exchange Mt. Gox, and the German government, which has been selling crypto it seized from criminal activities, increased supply, and held prices down.  

But all these sell off's are a one time thing, and have either recently finished selling or will be completed soon. 

JPMorgan’s reduced estimate of $8 billion accounts for $14 billion in new investments into crypto funds by July 9, $5 billion from Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) futures, and $5.7 billion raised by crypto venture capital funds this year. These amounts are then adjusted by subtracting $17 billion, which accounts for the shift from wallets on exchanges to new spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

-------
Author: Mark Pippen
London Newsroom
GlobalCryptoPress | Breaking Crypto News

This story somehow never runs out of surprising twists, and this one is massive.

Look back on almost any news coverage, or old posts in online crypto communities made by your average trader - in everyone's mind this was a story about people losing billions.  At one point it was probably true, when the market had just been hit with the Terra/Luna collapse There's no downplaying how much this story changes when it no longer involves anyone losing money.

At one point, every FTX user who had funds sitting on the exchange when it shut down believed they had lost money, with many expecting to hear all of it was gone. 

Searching old posts in online crypto communities made at the time FTX halted trading show there was little hope they would recover any funds they left in FTX controlled wallets.

Now we finally know how the story ends for the users of FTX - they're getting all of it back, and then some.

FTX Owes $11.2 Billion - All of That and More is Ready to Be Paid Out Immediately...

Under new leadership following FTX’s bankruptcy claim and the arrests of its former executives, liquidation of company assets began. This involved mainly dumping massive amounts of crypto over the last few months, enough where the $11.2 billion owed already sits in US dollars they can access anytime. But there’s more to come, as they claim to still have another $2+ billion in crypto that cannot yet be sold.

Sam participated in a common practice among VCs where projects offer them a chance to invest early by buying coins at an extremely low price. However, these coins are 'locked' and unable to be traded until a future date.

The biggest chunk of FTX's recent windfall of cash comes from Sam's early investment into Solana, where he’s rumored to have paid 0.20 cents per coin - they’re worth $133 each today, but FTX's bankruptcy team supposedly dumped a large amount when it was trading closer to $200.

Solana was the largest source of funds, worth billions, but FTX held millions of dollars worth of dozens of other coins, selling these off totaled several more billion dollars.

The end result - FTX can pay back all users right now, with a little extra. 

Sam and His Supporters Say This Changes Everything... 

According to his family, Sam is in prison wrongly labeled as someone who caused investors to lose billions. Now that the trial and sentencing are done, we learn no one lost anything, and they're even walking away with a small profit - this is a completely different situation than what he was sent to prison for.

32-year-old Sam is serving a sentence of 25 years, the prime of his life wasted - this is a punishment designed for someone who caused countless people to lose their hard earned money. 

He'll be 57 when released, that is if he survives prison, as his family says his 'social awkwardness' puts him at high risk of becoming the victim of 'extreme violence' from another inmate confusing Sam's awkwardness for rudeness. His cellmate from the NY jail that held Sam during the trial says there were times other inmates indeed targeted him.

Before Sentencing, The Judge Allowed Some FTX Users To Share Stories of How Their Lives Were Ruined...

At the time, the final outcome was still unknown. These users gave stories of their lives being ruined, stating things like "decades worth of savings" were gone forever because of Sam's actions.

These were the kind of stories the judge heard right before sentencing Sam to 25 years in prison.

It does make you wonder - would the sentence be different if these former FTX users only had stories of their funds being inaccessible, then eventually getting all of it back, with a small profit? Honestly, I have a hard time believing it wouldn't.

But Maybe This Shouldn't Change Anything...

Let's imagine the worst-case scenario. Sam, like everyone else, cannot actually predict the future. While his early investments into projects like Solana are bringing in billions in profits today, things also could have gone the other way.

You can say he made smart investments that paid off, as he knew they would, so from his point of view no user funds were ever at risk. But there's just some things he couldn't have known no matter how much research he put into his decisions. For example, what if Solana faced a massive hack? We've seen hacks ruin projects that had the potential to end up among the top 10 tokens - no one can predict the discovery of a new security vulnerability.

If an unforeseen hack did bring down Solana, this would be a story of FTX billions short on what they owe.

So, while things end with no one losing money, Sam did, in fact, gamble with user funds and expose them to potentially losing all of it.

On that note, while he was risking other people's money, did he plan to share the rewards if it all worked out? Of course not. Sam quietly 'borrowed' user funds without them knowing, he would have taken the profits and return what he had borrowed just as quietly as he took it.

We've all Been Damaged By Sam's Actions...

I was not an FTX user, but that didn't matter as we all watched our portfolios go into a nosedive the day FTX halted trading, and those losses weren't recouped for over a year.

But what many are unaware of is that the damages actually continue to the present day. The reason FTX has so much money right now because they dumped their massive stash of coins on the market over the last year, often at times the market was on the rise, bringing that rise to a halt.

In fact, FTX is the reason why we saw Bitcoin ETFs bringing billions of new investments into the market, and the price of Bitcoin barely move. Sam had purchased shares of Grayscale's Bitcoin Trust which automatically was converted into shares of Grayscale's ETF, so when the ETF went live FTX had 22 million shares of it - which they immediately dumped onto the market.

But it was FTX's Solana holdings that became worth billions while Sam was on trial - there's no way to know what Solana's price would be today if FTX hadn't dumped billions of dollars worth - but higher for sure, possibly much higher.

Fact is - Sam is a Liar...

Ironically, his largest broken promise is in print, on one of Sam's strangest marketing decisions.

The FTX condoms that read “Never breaks...even during large liquidations" - ironically describing the exact conditions that would indeed break FTX.  

In Closing...

This is all still sinking in, but when I think about Sam being in prison right now, it feels justified. He deserves some punishment.  Where I'm torn is if in 15 or 20 years from now, I'll feel like it's justified that he's still there. 

From a legal standpoint, the end result of a crime usually makes a massive difference.  For example, imagine someone driving the wrong way on a freeway because they're extremely drunk, and they manage not to kill anyone only because the other drivers swerved to avoid them. Then imagine the same scenario but in this one, the drunk driver kills an innocent driver in a head on collision.  Even though we're fully aware that both literally made the exact same poor choices - one could end up in prison for a few months, and the other for decades.

Ultimately, the choices Sam made led him here, making it hard to feel sorry for him now. So while I won't be campaigning to #FreeSam, I also wouldn't be angry to hear Sam's legal team was able to have the sentence re-evaluated, and reduced by a few years.

If you were the judge overseeing the case - what, if anything, would you change given what you know today? We want to know - share your answer with us on X @TheCryptoPress

---------------
Author: Ross Davis
Silicon Valley Newsroom
GCP | Breaking Crypto News